Organizational corrections are unfalsifiable: executives assert rationality without evidence, and the counterfactual is untestable. The claim that corrections are rational (“we overhired, so layoffs are the right fix”) cannot be falsified because we cannot test the counterfactual. But neither can the claim that they are wrong. The unfalsifiability itself is the point. Pfeffer’s data (companies that did not lay off performed equally well) provides the closest thing to empirical traction: the “rational correction” narrative does not hold up against the available natural experiment. The serial satisficing frame does not claim the corrections are wrong. It claims nobody knows, nobody checks, and nobody builds the feedback mechanisms that would let you find out next time.